1) Give a description of the problem
General logic review of the two REPEAT loops on line 79 and 148. Being the secondary grouping in their respective IF statements that has both WAIT and Asynchronous timing issues, would the use of the REPEAT function be the best use case and if so, is it implemented ‘properly’?
2) What is the expected behaviour?
The loops are repeated until specific switches are turned on.
**4) Post a Green Snapshot of the piston![image|45x37]
5) Attach logs after turning logging level to Full
11/26/2020, 7:39:03 AM +74ms
+0ms ╔Received event [Indian Trail].test = 1606397943073 with a delay of 0ms
+76ms ║Calculating (string) You must leave within + (string) 60 >> (string) You must leave within 60
+79ms ║Calculating (string) You must leave within 60 + (string) seconds or DISARM the alarm! >> (string) You must leave within 60 seconds or DISARM the alarm!
+82ms ║RunTime Analysis CS > 23ms > PS > 3ms > PE > 57ms > CE
+86ms ║Runtime (63161 bytes) successfully initialized in 3ms (v0.3.110.20191009) (84ms)
+87ms ║╔Execution stage started
+110ms ║║Condition #28 evaluated false (18ms)
+111ms ║║Condition group #25 evaluated false (state did not change) (20ms)
+122ms ║║Condition #44 evaluated false (7ms)
+123ms ║║Condition group #43 evaluated false (state did not change) (9ms)
+135ms ║║Condition #99 evaluated false (8ms)
+138ms ║║Condition group #98 evaluated false (state did not change) (10ms)
+149ms ║║Comparison (enum) off is (string) on = false (1ms)
+150ms ║║Condition #64 evaluated false (10ms)
+151ms ║║Condition group #63 evaluated false (state did not change) (11ms)
+163ms ║║Comparison (enum) off is (string) on = false (1ms)
+165ms ║║Condition #104 evaluated false (11ms)
+166ms ║║Condition group #103 evaluated false (state did not change) (12ms)
+173ms ║║Comparison (boolean) false changes_to (boolean) true = false (1ms)
+175ms ║║Condition #85 evaluated false (5ms)
+176ms ║║Condition group #84 evaluated false (state did not change) (7ms)
+198ms ║╚Execution stage complete. (112ms)
+207ms ╚Event processed successfully (207ms)