Here’s what I got now and still no luck. I’m going to clear the logs and post after the next time I go home.
webCoRE Presence Sensor - Approaching Places
They’re not the same number, but it was a boneheaded move on my part because I’d forgotten about the restrictions. So I removed that and it works fine however is there a way to make it so it doesn’t keep triggering repeatedly? Right now I’ve got notifications for testing purposes and must’ve gotten 20+ text messages before getting home! I’m just not sure how - thought maybe only once within a certain period of time, but what if I got home and then left again? What would you suggest?
You don’t want that in the followed by condition. It should be a separate condition. You might need to group the followed by commands so you can have an and between them
Ok how’s this? It works but again it’s giving multiple repeat notifications - is there a way to limit so that the piston only runs once at a time, but still be able to run other times if I leave and come back? Or at least make it so I only get one notification?
My apologies. In your places setup. Is your outter circle large enough that upon entering it that would accomplish your goals with this piston?
I do believe I might have been steering you in the wrong direction. If you answered yes to the above then you can simply use the following
If webcore presence arriving at place changes to “Home”
Then
Your actions
End if
This last time I came home only one notification came through, but here are the logs as you requested…
12/9/2017 12:53:07 PM +732ms
+2ms
╔Received event [Tall Pines].test = 1512841987721 with a delay of 7ms
+109ms
║RunTime Analysis CS > 22ms > PS > 64ms > PE > 26ms > CE
+121ms
║Runtime (37725 bytes) successfully initialized in 64ms (v0.2.0ff.20171129) (116ms)
+123ms
║╔Execution stage started
+167ms
║║Condition #5 evaluated false (24ms)
+168ms
║║Condition group #1 evaluated false (state did not change) (28ms)
+176ms
║╚Execution stage complete. (54ms)
+187ms
╚Event processed successfully (189ms)
12/9/2017 10:47:42 AM +657ms
+1ms
╔Received event [Gigantes].arrivingAtPlace = with a delay of 71ms
+124ms
║RunTime Analysis CS > 22ms > PS > 83ms > PE > 19ms > CE
+132ms
║Runtime (37718 bytes) successfully initialized in 83ms (v0.2.0ff.20171129) (130ms)
+133ms
║╔Execution stage started
+140ms
║║Comparison (string) changes_to (string) Home = false (0ms)
+141ms
║║Condition #5 evaluated false (4ms)
+142ms
║║Condition group #1 evaluated false (state did not change) (5ms)
+144ms
║╚Execution stage complete. (12ms)
+151ms
╚Event processed successfully (151ms)
12/9/2017 10:47:24 AM +541ms
+1ms
╔Received event [Gigantes].arrivingAtPlace = with a delay of 57ms
+708ms
║RunTime Analysis CS > 315ms > PS > 365ms > PE > 28ms > CE
+714ms
║Piston waited at a semaphore for 260ms
+716ms
║Runtime (37791 bytes) successfully initialized in 365ms (v0.2.0ff.20171129) (714ms)
+717ms
║╔Execution stage started
+725ms
║║Comparison (string) changes_to (string) Home = false (1ms)
+726ms
║║Condition #5 evaluated false (4ms)
+727ms
║║Condition group #1 evaluated false (state did not change) (5ms)
+729ms
║╚Execution stage complete. (12ms)
+736ms
╚Event processed successfully (736ms)
12/9/2017 10:47:24 AM +873ms
+1ms
╔Received event [Gigantes].arrivingAtPlace = Home with a delay of 48ms
+140ms
║RunTime Analysis CS > 11ms > PS > 105ms > PE > 24ms > CE
+148ms
║Runtime (37726 bytes) successfully initialized in 105ms (v0.2.0ff.20171129) (146ms)
+149ms
║╔Execution stage started
+157ms
║║Comparison (string) Home changes_to (string) Home = false (1ms)
+158ms
║║Cancelling condition #5’s schedules…
+159ms
║║Condition #5 evaluated false (5ms)
+160ms
║║Cancelling condition #1’s schedules…
+161ms
║║Condition group #1 evaluated false (state changed) (7ms)
+164ms
║╚Execution stage complete. (14ms)
+171ms
╚Event processed successfully (171ms)
12/9/2017 10:47:24 AM +249ms
+4ms
╔Received event [Gigantes].arrivingAtPlace = Home with a delay of 131ms
+134ms
║RunTime Analysis CS > 17ms > PS > 83ms > PE > 33ms > CE
+142ms
║Runtime (37727 bytes) successfully initialized in 83ms (v0.2.0ff.20171129) (137ms)
+143ms
║╔Execution stage started
+151ms
║║Comparison (string) Home changes_to (string) Home = true (0ms)
+153ms
║║Cancelling condition #5’s schedules…
+154ms
║║Condition #5 evaluated true (5ms)
+155ms
║║Cancelling condition #1’s schedules…
+155ms
║║Condition group #1 evaluated true (state changed) (7ms)
+158ms
║║Cancelling statement #2’s schedules…
+164ms
║║Skipped execution of physical command [Lamp].on([]) because it would make no change to the device. (3ms)
+165ms
║║Executed [Lamp].on (5ms)
+360ms
║║Executed physical command [Lamp].setColor([[hex: #006400, hue:33, saturation:100, level:20]]) (192ms)
+361ms
║║Executed [Lamp].setColor (193ms)
+376ms
║║Executed virtual command [Lamp].sendSMSNotification (9ms)
+379ms
║╚Execution stage complete. (236ms)
+388ms
╚Event processed successfully (388ms)
I just tried this syntax and it doesn’t work at all.
It doesn’t even generate an event. The first event I get is from the “present” event.
My final pistons got a bit more in there then when I started - basically it’s setup so that when arriving at home my porch light turns on and the last part is to turn it off upon entering front door.
One thing to note is I’m using webCoRE presence sensor that gives extra options that an arrival sensor will not give so I’m not sure what you’re using.
Not sure if this helps, but I have been watching my presence sensor in debug and driving outside, but near my geofences, I get “false” arrivingAt and departing notifications. It has been causing all kinds of piston issues as these events are coming so close that pistons that I use the arrivingAt/departing are cancelling.
I have another thread going where I am trying to filter out these false notifications based on GPS accuracy. Currently I have changed the DTH for presence sensor to give info if the GPS horizontalAccuracy is lower than 15 m (50ft). Watching my logs, my phone will give horizontalAccuracy of less than 10 when I am actually close to my house.
Until the app will actually filter out the low horizontalAaccuracy properly, I don’t know how to resolve these issues.